Articles  

PANIC AT THE THEATRE

Column: Exhibitionist  |  Date Published: Tuesday, 2 August 11   |  Author: Grace Carroll   |     |  9 months, 2 weeks ago
COMMENT HERE: comment


As stories of financial doom and gloom continue to fill news headlines, a depression-era play is about to hit the Canberra stage. Poet-playwright Archibald MacLeish’s verse drama PANIC may have been written in 1935, but the story of a magnate, played by Tony Turner, and the panic-driven cries of a populace who turn to him for help to stay afloat during the Great Depression certainly still resonates in today’s financial climate. In its Australian premiere, director and researcher Andrew Holmes presents an interpretation of the play that stays true to its origins, whilst bringing the story to contemporary audiences, themselves familiar with the trials and tribulations of capitalist society.

Panic is a classic tale of the dichotomy between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have nots’. The former is represented by bank magnate McGafferty, the play’s protagonist, and the latter by a crowd of middle class citizens, fearing for their financial future amidst great economic hardship. The play derives its energy from the human drama between these groups, and their poetic dialogue. Action takes place between two sets; McGafferty’s office and on the streets below, where a group of angry and desperate citizens make panicked cries to the banker, pleading for his help. Those quick to see McGafferty and the capitalist powerhouses he represents as the enemy may be surprised by the production. Rather than dislike McGafferty, Holmes hopes that, by the end of the production, audiences “can identify with the lead character”.

Despite being a three-time Pulitzer Prize winner MacLeish is likely to be an unfamiliar name to many in Australia. A one-time Librarian of Congress and Academy Award winner, MacLeish has what Holmes calls “cult-hero status” in America. He comments that MacLeish wrote in a “very American” style, which explains this status. Amidst this public persona, his impressive collection of poetry and prose has been neglected – with this obscurity something that researchers like Holmes love. The director is writing his PhD on MacLeish, and hopes that through his research, including the showing of Panic and another MacLeish play, Fall of the City, later this year, will make people more aware of the writer and Modernist verse drama.

Given the production is being staged for research purposes, Holmes has invited audiences to come along for free. Yes, it’s free! His main interest is seeing how audiences respond to Panic, especially its verse style. In order to capture these responses, audiences will be asked to fill out feedback forms after each performance. Those attending Thursday performances will also be invited to participate in a Q & A forum after the show. This is a unique opportunity for theatregoers, offering a rare insight into the production that MacLeish, as a social commentator, would have appreciated.

Panic exemplifies MacLeish’s Modernist style, focussing on the society in which he lived. His works have been described as the voice of reason amid a troubled capitalist society, as his writing attempted to traverse the middle ground between realism and idealism. At the same time, the narratives in these works encourage unity, rather than looking for someone or something to blame. Holmes believes that these universal themes are the ultimate message of the play. The director goes on to explain that the strength of MacLeish’s writing, including Panic, lies in its ability to provide “real insight into what humanity has to deal with”. This insight offers as much to contemporary audiences as to those who lived through the Great Depression.

Panic’s verse style works perfectly with the play’s disjuncture between realism and idealism. As Holmes points out, despite the plot being based on real events, the verse style, which he describes as “like music” is something unnatural, being a form of expression that people do not use in everyday life. This blend of human drama with poetic artifice is something that writers have long drawn on to create human engagement with their works. Fans of Shakespeare will be familiar with the verse drama, but may not be aware that this style – which has its origins in Greek tragedy – was also embraced by Modernist writers, including William Butler Yeats and T.S. Eliot.

In Panic, MacLeish draws on the tradition of verse drama to emphasise the disparity between McGafferty and the panicked citizens. Throughout the play, McGafferty speaks with longer, rougher prose, while the people on the street are given more elegant, shorter lines. This difference successfully separates the perspectives of McGafferty and ‘the people’. It also helps capture the banker’s isolation and need to explain himself, whereas the people are bolstered by many voices, needing fewer words to express their point of view. The playwright’s unique style of verse drama was developed, as Holmes contends, “to capture the American language”. This verse style, which rarely hits the Canberra stage, offers something different for audiences.

While the title of the play may cause pulses to rise, the moral of the story is ultimately: don’t panic! Although written almost 80 years ago, Panic has much to say about the way we live our lives and the social mechanisms through which our world operates. Given that the world is as driven by capitalism and the economic divide between the rich and the poor as it was in the 1930s, the play promises to offer some insight into the way we all live our lives. On that note, the last word goes to Holmes, who promises that Panic will be “unlike anything audiences will have seen before”.

Panic is a free production and will be showing on the Main Stage at the ANU Arts Centre from Thursday-Saturday August 18-27. Bookings can be made via email to andrew.holmes@anu.edu.au .



AUSTRALIA’S FIRST IRANIAN FILM FEST:

This August sees Canberra put another notch in its cultural belt. Australia’s first IRANIAN FILM FESTIVAL is heading to town and, outside of Canberra, it is only playing in Brisbane and Adelaide. You may not be particularly au fait with Iranian film (I’m certainly not) but luckily for us Anne Démy-Geroe and Armin Miladi, the co-directors of the festival, are. Anne was the director of the Brisbane International Film Festival for nine years and is currently working on a PhD in Iranian cinema, and Armin is a young Iranian-Australian filmmaker.

I am impressed that Iranian cinema can elicit a festival in such a far-flung country as Australia: Iran must have a thriving film industry. When I ask Anne why this is the case she explains that, “it seems that it is every Iranian’s ambition to become a filmmaker. In the west, we aspire to be the hero of the film but Iranians aspire to be behind the camera.” Culture is important to Iranians; historically this has manifested itself as literature and poetry but now this creative energy has moved to cinema.

The festival aims to provide us with a broader view Iran, away from the usual clichés and stereotypes. There are six films coming to Canberra. Two films, The White Meadows and Iron Island, are by the young filmmaker Mohammed Rasoulof who was arrested last year. The White Meadows is an allegorical film, sharply critical of the Iranian government,” Anne explains and Rousoulof himself has described it as a “clandestine, underground film”.

Probably more palatable to the Iranian Government would be Gold & Copper, a film set in the heartland of conservative Iran. It tells the story of a young man studying to become a mullah, whose spiritual journey takes a different, much more personal turn when his wife is diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. In stark contrast to this is the film Circumstance, made by US-Iranian filmmaker Maryam Keshavarz. This film is described as both a triangle of love and place; a sumptuous and subversive film that has a unique take on contemporary Iranian youth culture.

The festival is also showing The Hunter, a thriller which acts as a metaphor for Iran. And Rainy Seasons, a film set in middle class Iran which tells a universal coming of age story. “If they didn’t have headscarves on,” Anne says, “you wouldn’t know it was set in Iran!”

“The program is really the sum of its parts,” explains Anne – it showcases the diversity in Iranian cinema. This diversity may be a bit of surprise, but Anne admits that the reasons for it are complicated. “There is a saying in Iran,” she tells me. “That ‘everything is possible and nothing is possible.’” This festival seems to be a real testament to that.

Australia’s first Iranian Film Festival will be held between Thursday-Sunday August 11-21 at the National Film and Sound Archive’s Arc Cinema. Check the festival’s website for details: www.iffa.net.au.

COMMENT HERE: comment »
THROW ME A FRICKIN’ BONO HERE:

“Through this journey we’ve taken together, U2 and I have reached a higher place of unity. I have those guys around for drinks and dinner every night in my head.” It sounds like a fan’s wet dream, hanging out with Bono and The Edge over a candlelit meal but for David Finnigan, idly flicking through a copy of Eamon Dunphy’s hagiography Unforgettable Fire: The Story of U2 one night at a languorous tech rehearsal, it became an obsession that metamorphosed itself into “an 86 minute, 12-part ‘goat that swallowed the world’ style monster” of a radio play. Yet in fairness he admits he was never a massive fan previous to the experience: “...they were always like a shrill mosquito whine in the back of your ears you learn to deal with. Fuck man, every time I hear about ‘80s revivals or ‘80s-themed parties or whatever I still slightly recoil, because that decade sounded cold-fucking-horrible.” It’s like listening to a drunken rant from Dad about the decay of rock ‘n’ roll, but inflected with a wit that is so bizarre and eloquent you can only pay attention with Schadenfreude-esque glee; not that it’s probable that U2 are listening to Finnigan’s one man crusade, but if they were I can imagine Bono’s painted grin cracking at the edges.

And as if to exacerbate his frustrations, the five radio playlets were hardly an immaculate conception, but became a constant struggle with his own sanity; creatively, Finnigan’s mind is like a chainsaw spiralling in a hurricane, relentless and destructive. “For every thousand words you write in a playwriting period, only the 100 that are on topic make it into the script. For this script, everything I was writing at the time went in the script, because everything was about U2. If I had a two minute freak out on a Friday night and ended up curled in a doorway at the side of the street writing babble, that made it in. If I quoted some of Unforgettable Fire: The Story of U2 on Facebook and had a conversation with 15 friends from around the everywhere, that made it in. If my friend and Applespiel member Rachel Roberts had to take a Theology course owing to scheduling clashes at her university and I had an opinion about that (of course I had an opinion about that), that made it in.”

So exactly what is this? Finnigan seems more Zen about it than I am. “This piece is incredibly loose and myopic but fuck it that’s what it is, and there was no point in trying to craft it into something it was not... It’s pulling in ex-Canberran artists from Sydney, Melbourne, London (as well as Sipat Lawin from Manila who are, in every sense of the word, wildcards) and finding a way to be theatre-makers together that doesn’t require us to all be in the room together.” It’s Theatre of Cruelty for the Information Age, a radio play without character and plot, its Finnigan’s sadistic child, and it’s all that and so much more.

All 12 parts of Functioning as a Machine That Hates U2 are available for free download from blind-dragonfly.com/?p=663 .

COMMENT HERE: comment »
MAGNIFICENT MONSTROSITY:

MONSTROSITY brings together the work of three Canberra artists who share a unique fascination with the perverse, the deviant, the ugly and the altogether monstrous aspects of life. Bev Bruen, Julie Munro-Allison and Michelle Day all met when they were studying in the Textiles workshop at the ANU School of Art; since then all of their work has strayed from the medium but their shared passions and interests remain.

For these three the idea of doing a show together has been a dream for several years, after they first realised they shared a very similar aesthetic in art school. As Munro-Allison comments, “I think we shared a similar aesthetic in terms of the materials we used; we were all using old bones, and the idea for Monstrosity arose really from noticing that aesthetic similarity.”

The body features heavily in this exhibition from the mechanical fleshy hybrids of Michelle Day’s delicate silicone, fabric, metal and glass creations, to Julie Munro-Allison’s magazine cut out collages of fashion models’ body parts and Bev Bruen’s sculptural pieces constructed from animal bones and doll bodies. Each artist seems fascinated by the consequences of scientific experimentation and the splicing together of disparate parts.

For Bruen, this involves creating monsters. One series of her small creatures are constructed from animal skulls, bones and doll bodies and as Bruen explains they are “directly relating to the interspecies Chimera – they are ambiguous, marginal beings that endanger conventional taxonomies of nature.”

She goes on to explain that she is particularly interested “in monsters as the metaphorical embodiment of our fears. In medieval religious iconography the monster was imagined as a hybrid being, a collage of different animal and human bodies. Today, medical science is experimenting with interspecies embryology.”

Bruen’s work, like that of Day’s and Munro-Allison’s, plays directly into those ideas of the grotesque and the abject. Those boundaries that lie between fear and disgust, the beautiful and the ugly, the living and the dead are the realm of Monstrosity. Munro-Allison elaborates that “the pieces in Monstrosity suggest how close desire and disgust and fear and comfort can be to each other. It’s that space between them when they are so close which is fascinating and presents so many questions.”

Munro-Allison’s work focuses on collage in its most basic, and satisfying, form: the magazine collage. Dissimilar body parts come together to form creatures that no longer look human; ugly and unappealing figures comprised of parts from unrealistically perfect models.

Her other work includes the piece Winners, a group of small sculptural pieces, assemblages incorporating trophies and other ornate silverware, as well as eggshells, bones, hair and feathers.

If you have a fascination with the grotesque, the ugly and the intriguingly beautiful then Monstrosity is just the exhibition for you.

Monstrosity opens 6pm Thursday August 4 at the Canberra Contemporary Art Space in Manuka and continues until Sunday August 14.

COMMENT HERE: comment »
 

 
blog comments powered by Disqus




more ...
more stuff ...